WILDERNESS VOICE: 2.“We The Other People” are not “MIGRANT GRUNTS”
2. “We The Other People” are not “MIGRANT GRUNTS”
Has anyone stopped to wonder why the present issue of
immigration is single focused on “Brown?” If it’s realistically about weeding
out illegal residents and criminal elements; why are members from Europe,
Middle East, Asia, and Africa not being rounded up? Hasn’t the Italian Mob been
allegedly dismantled and replaced by those stemming from all over (Russia, Japan,
and Jamaica etc.)? Face it and let the truth be told: Had the Cosa Nostra been
left alone they would have done a better, tax-free job of protecting our ports
and borders than the feds. So yes! There is more in play than meets the eye!
For starters, Venezuela. If it’s about drug trafficking,
what about Columbia and its surrounding cohorts in Central America? If it’s
just about American business pirating foreign oil, why so focused on hindering its
exports to places considered threats to America’s future (e.g. China and Cuba)?
Consider how unlike America flexing military muscle, China has long been
successfully investing in building Venezuela’s infrastructure without imposing
political agendas. As for Cuba, who regardless of enduring U.S. embargos (and
other recent forms of economic strangle holds e.g. tourism), has simply offered
medical, technical and educational supports throughout South/Central America
and the Carabeens (e.g. Haiti, a long-standing victim of American meddling)? Point!
To better understand present immigration issues, some historic examination is
worthwhile! And let’s be clear, this has everything to do with American
Business Practices, not American citizen concerns.
Keeping the Monroe Doctrine in mind, consider: The
Spanish American War (part of getting rid of European participation in the
western hemisphere), the Treaty of Paris (giving America options to acquisition
or annex Puerto Rico and Guam (as strategic military outposts), Cuba (where
major business investors sought to keep it out of government monitoring), and The
Philippines (the only island to fight and eventually become an independent
nation). Adding Haiti (with poor) and Santo Domingo (with stronger) political
and economic roots to the landscape, Brown and Black immigration has long been
a politically well-insulated, Census monitored issue controlled by periodic
open/close policy changes to satisfy MILITARY/ECONOMIC NEEDS and keeping The
Monroe Doctrine’s intent intact. Thus, it seems to have been about letting
defined seasonal low wage brown as GARBAGE IN when needed and,
before becoming a threat to established standard trends, setting the GARBAGE
OUT when done! And although “BLACK” is still an issue, let’s stay with
what’s presently on the front line of ICE concerns: “Brown!”
The growing Latino population has become an issue of concern for traditional American ideology.
While significantly contributing to the national workforce and economy, adding increased
immigration from Latin America to previously controlled sources from Mexico and
the Caribbean has sparked debates; accommodating job competition, supporting inherent
strains on social services, absorbing its effects on ever changing cultural
demographics, and politically threatening 25+ percent voter impact. Thus, increased
expedient (but inappropriate) border security and immigration reform. But
again, that’s an “American Business” not an “American Citizen” concern. And there is a need to make that distinction! We are all sojourning human immigrants
allegedly seeking to live and let live not migrant mechanical automatons subjugated
to the growing presence of artificial discretion.
As long as The Monroe Doctrine (with the help of The
Teller Amendment, The Jones act, the present Save America proposition etc.), continues
to linger in the shadows to be reinterpreted, supported and covertly applied;
the Caribbeans, Mexico, Central and South America will continue to be viewed as
satellites generating disobedient clones
subject to American disciplinary actions.
Brown needs to reconsider its position, its present focus, and the
opportunity at hand: Claiming Constitutional Rights and considering Legal Class
Action suits against varied forms of segregation and unrestricted exploitation.
Could such a threat be the underlying issue of concern?

Comments
Post a Comment